README.zxid
###########
<<author: Sampo Kellomäki (sampo@iki.fi)>>
<<cvsid: $Id: README.zxid,v 1.125 2009-11-24 23:53:40 sampo Exp $>>
<<class: article!a4paper!!ZXID 23>>

<<abstract:

ZXID.org Identity Management toolkit implements standalone SAML 2.0 and
Liberty ID-WSF 2.0 stacks and aims at implementing all popular
federation and ID Web Services protocols.  It is a C implementation
with minimal external dependencies - OpenSSL, CURL, and zlib -
ensuring easy deployment (no DLLhell). Due to its small footprint and
efficient and accurate schema driven implementation, it is suitable
for embedded and high volume applications. Language bindings to all
popular highlevel languages such as PHP, Perl, and Java, are provided
via SWIG.  ZXID implements, as of July 07, SP, WSC, and WSP roles. IdP
role will follow as the project evolves.\\\\

ZXID.org ist eine C-Bibliothek, die den vollständigen SAML
2.0-Stack implementiert und alle populären
Identitätsverwaltungs-Protokolle wie Liberty ID-FF 1.2,
WS-Federation, WS-Trust und ID-Webservices wie Liberty ID-WSF 1.1 und
2.0 implementieren will. Sie beruht auf Schema-basierter
Code-Erzeugung, woraus eine genaue Implementation resultiert. SWIG
wird verwendet, um Schnittstellen zu Skriptsprachen wie Perl, PHP und
Python sowie zu Java bereitzustellen. Sie kann als SP, WSC und
WSP fungieren.\\\\

A biblioteca de gestão de identidades ZXID.org é uma
implementação, em C, das normas SAML 2.0 e Liberty ID-WSF 2.0 com
dependências externas mínimas - OpenSSL, CURL, e zlib - facilitando
uma implantação fácil sem "inferno dos DLL". Sendo económica em
consumo de recursos é indicada para aplicações embutidas ou
de grande volume e performance. A biblioteca é disponibilizada para
todos os linguagens de programação de alto nível como, p.ex.,
PHP, Perl, e Java, atravez de interfáces SWIG. ZXID de hoje (Jul
07) pode funcionar nos papeis SP (Provedor de Serviços), WSC
(Cliente de Serviços Web) e WSP (Provedor de Serviços Web),
sendo o papel IdP (Provedor de Identidade) suportado
na futura evolução do projecto.\\\\

La librería de gestión de identidades ZXID.org es una
implementación en C de las normas SAML 2.0 y Liberty ID-WSF 2.0,
con dependencias externas mínimas - OpenSSL, CURL, y zlib - que
elimina el "Infierno DLL" en su implantación. Como ZXID es muy económica,
es apta para aplicaciones embebidas o de gran volumen y
envergadura. Los lenguajes de programación de alto nivel, como Perl,
PHP, y Java, son soportados con generador de interfaces SWIG. Hoy (Feb
07) el ZXID soporta los roles SP (proveedor de servicios) y WSC
(cliente de los servicios web). Los roles IdP (proveedor de
identidades) y WSP (proveedor de servicios web) serán soportados
en fases futuras del proyecto.\\\\

ZXID.org on verkkohenkilöllisyyden ja -tunnisteiden
hallintakirjasto joka tukee SAML 2.0 (sisäänkirjaantuminen) ja
Liberty ID-WSF 2.0 (henkilöllisyyteen pohjautuvat webbipalvelut)
standardeja. ZXID vaatii vain OpenSSL, CURL ja zlib
kirjastot joten se välttää "DLL helvetti"-ongelman.
Skemapohjaisena C toteutuksena se on tarkka ja
taloudellinen ja kelpaa sulautettuihin ja erittäin kovaa
suorituskykyä vaativiin sovelluksiin. Se tukee korkeantason
kieliä - kuten Perliä, PHP:tä, ja Javaa - SWIG generoiduin
rajapinnoin. ZXID tukee (Heinäkuu 07) SP (palveluntarjoaja), WSC
(webbipalvelunkutsuja), ja WSP (webbipalveluntarjoaja) rooleja.  IdP
(henkilöllisyydenvarmentaja) rooli toteutetaan projektin tulevissa
vaiheissa.

>>

<<maketoc: 1>>

1 Other Documentation
=====================

This README.zxid is in process of being rewritten and restructured.
A lot of the material has moved to specific files, which
you should read.

* <<link:mod_auth_saml.html: mod_auth_saml>> Apache
  module documentation: SSO without programming.
* <<link:zxid-simple.html: zxid_simple()>> Easy API for SAML
* <<link:zxid-raw.html: ZXID Raw API>>: Program like
  the pros (and fix your own problems). See also <<link:../ref/html/index.html: Function Reference>>
* <<link:zxid-wsf.html: ZXID ID-WSF API>>: Make Identity Web Services Calls using ID-WSF
* <<link:zxid-install.html: ZXID Compilation and Installation>>: Compile
  and install from source or package. See also <<link:html/INSTALL.zxid.html: INSTALL.zxid>>
  for quick overview.
* <<link:zxid-conf.html: ZXID Configuration Reference>>: Nitty gritty
  on all options.
* <<link:zxid-cot.html: ZXID Circle of Trust Reference>>: How to
  set up the Circle of Trust, i.e. the partners your web site works with.
* <<link:zxid-log.html: ZXID Logging Reference>>: ZXID digitally signed logging facility
* <<link:zxid-java.html: javazxid>>: Using ZXID from Java
* <<link:zxid-perl.html: Net::SAML>>: Using ZXID from Perl
* <<link:zxid-php.html: php_zxid>>: Using ZXID from PHP
* <<link:zxid-idp.html: IdP>>: Configuring zxididp
* <<link:zxid-faq.html: FAQ>>: Frequently Asked Questions
* <<link:../README.smime: README.smime>>: Crypto and Cert Tutorial

* zxid.user@lists.unh.edu mailing list

2 ZXID Project
==============

Web site:: http://zxid.org/
License::  Open source: Apache 2, see License chapter and file COPYING

Immediate goal: build a SAML 2.0 SP and ID-WSF 2.0 WSC

Goals of ZXID project include

* SOAP 1.1 support (done)
* SAML 2.0 compliance
  - SP role (done)
  - IdP role (done)
* Liberty ID-FF 1.2 support
  - SP
  - IdP
  - SAML 1.1
* Liberty ID-WSF 1.1 support
  - Discovery bootstrap
  - Discovery WSC
  - ID-DAP WSC
  - ID-DAP WSP
* Liberty ID-WSF 2.0 support
  - Discovery bootstrap (done)
  - Discovery WSC (done)
  - Discovery WSP (done)
  - ID-DAP WSC (done)
  - ID-DAP WSP (alpha)

<<table: ZXID Platform Support
Platform        Native     Cross Compile    Notes
=============== ========== ================ ================================
Linux-ix86      gcc-3.4.6  n/a              Development platform
Solaris 8-sparc gcc-3.4.6  Linux gcc-3.4.6  Fully functional
Windows 2000    -          Linux gcc-3.4.6  Poorly tested
xBSD/Unix       gcc-3.4.6  n/a              C core tested, language bindings not tested
>>

<<table: ZXID Feature and Language Support (version number indicates last testing)
Feature               C     mod_perl mod_php Python Java/Tomcat Apache Shell
===================== ===== ======== ======= ====== =========== ====== =====
Geo Location          Alpha
ID-MM7                Alpha
ID-DAP                Beta
ID-HR-XML             Beta
Contact Book          Alpha
People Service        Alpha
Discovery             0.41
Web Services (ID-WSF) 0.41
Authorization (XACML) 0.40  yes      0.40    Plan   0.40        0.40
SSO                   0.17  0.17     0.17    Plan   0.17        0.40   0.17
>>

<<table: ZXID Enabled Application Packages
Application    Language      Notes
============== ============= =====================================================
DokuWiki       PHP           Patch available, in process of submitting to DokuWiki authors
Mahara         PHP           4Q2009
>>

<<ignore: table: ZXID Enabled Application Packages
Application    Language      Notes
============== ============= ==============================
MediaWiki      PHP           Planned
Cognito
zxbug          Perl          Planned
>>

2.1 Project Layout
------------------

Following directory layout is used by the project. Many of the specified
directories are used by intermediate outputs that are not distributed
in tarball releases, but may or may no be present in CVS checkouts.

  zxid-0.xx
   |
   +-- Net       The Net::SAML perl module (also mod_perl)
   +-- php       PHP / mod_php integration
   +-- zxidjava  The Java JNI interface to ZXID
   +-- servlet   Apache Tomcat integration
   +-- c         C code generated from the Schema Grammar descriptions
   +-- sg        Schema Grammar (.sg) descriptions of protocols
   +-- xsd       XML schema descriptions of protocols (not distributed)
   +-- tex       Temporary files for document generation using PlainDoc (not distributed)
   +-- html      HTML documentation generated using PlainDoc
   +-- review    Publicly released announcements and documents (not distributed)
   +-- t         Test scripts and expected test outputs
   `-- tmp       Temporary files, such as actual test outputs

The Manifest file, which follows, explains each file in more detail.

<<logoutput:
<<Manifest>>
>>

2.2 Protocol Encoders and Decoders
----------------------------------

The protocol encoders and decoders are generated automatically from
the schema grammar (.sg) descriptions. This ensures accurate protocol
implementation. While the output is strictly schema driven and correct,
the decoders have some provisions to accept some deviations from
strict spec (e.g. out of order elements are tolerated). However,
one should note that XMLDSIG does not tolerate very much deviation,
thus even if decoder accepts a slightly illformed message, it is likely
to fail in signature verification.

There are three outputs from generation

1. Data structures describing the data (xx.h)
2. Encoder that linearizes the data structure to wire protocol (xx-enc.c)
3. Decoder that converts wire protocol byte stream to a data structure (xx-dec.c)

2.3 Standards and Namespaces
----------------------------

ZXID uses consistently the same namespace prefixes throughout the project. The
generated encoders and decoders support following schemata

<<longtable: ZXID Namespace Convention
Prefix URI                                            Description
====== ============================================== =================================
sa     urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion          SAML 2.0
sp     urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:protocol
md     urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:metadata
ecp    urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:profiles:SSO:ecp
shibmd urn:mace:shibboleth:metadata:1.0               Shibboleth 2.0 Metadata extensions

idpdisc
urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:profiles:SSO:idp-discovery-protocol
SAML IdP Discovery
paos   urn:liberty:paos:2006-08
sa11   urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:assertion          SAML 1.1
sp11   urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:protocol
ff12   urn:liberty:iff:2003-08                        ID-FF 1.2
m20    urn:liberty:metadata:2004-12                   v2.0 (almost same as 1.2)
ac     urn:liberty:ac:2004-12                         v2.0 (almost same as 1.2)
b12    urn:liberty:sb:2003-08                         ID-WSF 1.1 SOAP Binding
sec12  urn:liberty:sec:2003-08                        ID-WSF 1.1 Security Mechanisms
di12   urn:liberty:disco:2003-08                      ID-WSF 1.1 Discovery Service
is12   urn:liberty:is:2003-08                         ID-WSF 1.1 Interaction Service
lu     urn:liberty:util:2006-08                       ID-WSF 2.0 Utility Schema
sbf    urn:liberty:sb                                 Framework header
b      urn:liberty:sb:2006-08                         ID-WSF 2.0 SOAP Binding
sec    urn:liberty:security:2006-08                   ID-WSF 2.0 Security Mechanisms
di     urn:liberty:disco:2006-08                      ID-WSF 2.0 Discovery Service
is     urn:liberty:is:2006-08                         ID-WSF 2.0 Interaction Service
dap    urn:liberty:id-sis-dap:2006-08:dst-2.1         ID Directory Access Protocol
dst    urn:liberty:dst:2006-08                        Data Services Template 2.1
subs   urn:liberty:ssos:2006-08                       Subscription and Notification
ps     urn:liberty:ps:2006-08                         People Service
im     urn:liberty:ims:2006-08                        Identity Mapping svc (aka Token Map)
as     urn:liberty:sa:2006-08                         ID-WSF 2.0 Authentication Service
cb     urn:liberty:id-sis-cb:2004-10                  Contact Book Protocol (DST 2.0 based)
cdm    urn:liberty:cb:conceptual-data-model:2004-10   Contact Book Common Data Model
gl     urn:liberty:id-sis-gl:2005-07                  Geolocation Service

mm7
http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/23_series/23.140/schema/REL-6-MM7-1-4
ID-MM7 (ID-SIS-CSM)
dp     urn:liberty:dp:2006-12                         ID-WSF 2.0 Design Patterns
idp    urn:liberty:idp:2006-12                        ID-WSF 2.0 IdP as web svc
pmm    urn:liberty:pmm:2006-12                        ID-WSF 2.0 Prov Mod Mgr
prov   urn:liberty:prov:2006-12                       ID-WSF 2.0 TM Provisioning
shps   urn:liberty:shps:2006-12                       ID-WSF 2.0 Svc Handling and Proxying
e      http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/      SOAP 1.1, with SAML and WSF
xa     urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:policy:schema:os  XACML 2.0
xac    urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:context:schema:os
xasp   urn:oasis:xacml:2.0:saml:protocol:schema:os
xasa   urn:oasis:xacml:2.0:saml:assertion:schema:os

xaspcd1
urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:profile:saml2.0:v2:schema:protocol:cd-01
Committee draft with extensions for passing policies as input

xasacd1
urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:profile:saml2.0:v2:schema:assertion:cd-01
Committee draft with extentsions

wst
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/
WS-Trust 1.3 CD-01
wsp    http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy   *** Newer version? http://www.w3.org/ns/ws-policy/

wsc
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-secureconversation/200512
WS-Secure Conversation CD-01
ds     http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#             XML Signatures
xenc   http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#              XML Encryption
exca   http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#        Exclusive Canonicalization
a      http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing           WSA 1.0

wsse
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd
WS Security SecExt 1.0

wsu
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd
WS Security Utility 1.0
xml    http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace           http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd
xsi    http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance
xs     http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema               Namespace only, no code

igf0   urn:LibertyAlliance:igf:0.3:core               Early draft 01, WIP
carml0 urn:LibertyAlliance:igf:0.3:carml              Early draft 03, WIP
tas3   http://tas3.eu/tas3/200911/                    TAS3 Credentials passing

tas3sol
http://tas3.eu/tas3sol/200911/
TAS3 Simple Obligations Language
>>


96 Copyright, License, Notices, and Acknowledgements
====================================================

Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Symlabs (symlabs@symlabs.com), All Rights Reserved.
Author: Sampo Kellomäki (sampo@iki.fi)

Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.

The research leading to these results has received funding from the
European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under
grant agreement number 216287 (TAS3 - Trusted Architecture for Securely
Shared Services - www.tas3.eu).

While the source distribution of ZXID does not contain
SSLeay or OpenSSL code, if you use this code you will use OpenSSL
library. Please give Eric Young and OpenSSL team credit (as required by
their licenses).

Binary distribution of this product includes software developed by the
OpenSSL Project for use in the OpenSSL Toolkit
(http://www.openssl.org/). See LICENSE.openssl for further information.

Binary distribution of this product includes cryptographic software
written by Eric Young (eay@cryptsoft.com).  Binary distribution of
this product includes software written by Tim Hudson
(tjh@cryptsoft.com). See LICENSE.ssleay for further information.

And remember, you, and nobody else but you, are responsible for
auditing ZXID and OpenSSL library for security problems,
back-doors, and general suitability for your application.

96.1 Dependency Library Licenses
--------------------------------

ZXID strives to maintain IPR hygiene and avoid both
non-free and GPL license contamination. All the
dependency libraries have, and shall have, BSD style licenses

* OpenSSL under BSDish (with "advertising" clause)
* libcurl under BSDish
* zlib under BSDish
* libc available as part of the operating system

Please see each library package for the exact details of their
licenses.

96.1.1 Yubikey
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Contains libyubikey components which are subject to following
notice:

> Written by Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>.
> Copyright (c) 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 Yubico AB
> All rights reserved.
>
> Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
> met:
>
>   > Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
>      notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>
>   > Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
>      copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following
>      disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided
>      with the distribution.
>
> THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
> "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
> LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
> A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
> OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
> SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
> LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
> DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
> THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
> (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
> OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

96.1.2 OpenSSL
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The source distribution references, but does not contain, OpenSSL. The
binary distributions may incorporate or dynamically link to OpenSSL,
which is subject to the following terms and conditions:

> Copyright (c) 1998-2005 The OpenSSL Project.  All rights reserved.
> 
> Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
> are met:
> 
> 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
>    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. 
> 
> 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
>    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
>    the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
>    distribution.
> 
> 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this
>    software must display the following acknowledgment:
>    "This product includes software developed by the OpenSSL Project
>    for use in the OpenSSL Toolkit. (http://www.openssl.org/)"
> 
> 4. The names "OpenSSL Toolkit" and "OpenSSL Project" must not be used
>    to endorse or promote products derived from this software without
>    prior written permission. For written permission, please contact
>    openssl-core@openssl.org.
> 
> 5. Products derived from this software may not be called "OpenSSL"
>    nor may "OpenSSL" appear in their names without prior written
>    permission of the OpenSSL Project.
> 
> 6. Redistributions of any form whatsoever must retain the following
>    acknowledgment:
>    "This product includes software developed by the OpenSSL Project
>    for use in the OpenSSL Toolkit (http://www.openssl.org/)"
> 
> THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE OpenSSL PROJECT ``AS IS'' AND ANY
> EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
> IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
> PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE OpenSSL PROJECT OR
> ITS CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
> SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT
> NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES;
> LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
> HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT,
> STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
> ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED
> OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
> ====================================================================
> 
> This product includes cryptographic software written by Eric Young
> (eay@cryptsoft.com).  This product includes software written by Tim
> Hudson (tjh@cryptsoft.com).

96.1.3 SSLeay
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The source distribution references, but does not contain, OpenSSL
which contains SSLeay. The binary distributions may incorporate or
dynamically link to OpenSSL containing SSLeay, which is subject to the
following terms and conditions:

> Copyright (C) 1995-1998 Eric Young (eay@cryptsoft.com)
> All rights reserved.
> 
> This package is an SSL implementation written
> by Eric Young (eay@cryptsoft.com).
> The implementation was written so as to conform with Netscape's SSL.
> 
> This library is free for commercial and non-commercial use as long as
> the following conditions are adhered to.  The following conditions
> apply to all code found in this distribution, be it the RC4, RSA,
> lhash, DES, etc., code; not just the SSL code.  The SSL documentation
> included with this distribution is covered by the same copyright terms
> except that the holder is Tim Hudson (tjh@cryptsoft.com).
> 
> Copyright remains Eric Young's, and as such any Copyright notices in
> the code are not to be removed.
> If this package is used in a product, Eric Young should be given
> attribution as the author of the parts of the library used.
> This can be in the form of a textual message at program startup or
> in documentation (online or textual) provided with the package.
> 
> Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
> are met:
> 
> 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the copyright
>    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
>    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
>    the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
>    distribution.
> 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this
>    software must display the following acknowledgement:
>    "This product includes cryptographic software written by
>     Eric Young (eay@cryptsoft.com)"
>    
>    The word 'cryptographic' can be left out if the routines from the
>    library being used are not cryptographic related :-).
> 4. If you include any Windows specific code (or a derivative thereof)
>    from the apps directory (application code) you must include an
>    acknowledgement:
>    "This product includes software written by Tim Hudson 
>    (tjh@cryptsoft.com)"
> 
> THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY ERIC YOUNG ``AS IS'' AND
> ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
> IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR 
> PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR OR CONTRIBUTORS
> BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, 
> OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT
> OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR 
> BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
> HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT,
> STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING
> IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
> POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
> 
> The license and distribution terms for any publicly available
> version or derivative of this code cannot be changed.  i.e. this
> code cannot simply be copied and put under another distribution
> license [including the GNU Public License.]

96.2 Specification IPR
----------------------

ZXID is based on open SAML, Liberty, and TAS3 specifications. The
parties that have developed these specifications, including Symlabs,
have made Royalty Free (RF) licensing commitment. Please ask OASIS,
Liberty Alliance, and TAS3 project for the specifics of their IPR
policies and IPR disclosures.

Some protocols, such as WS-Trust and WS-Federation enjoy Microsoft's
pledge<<footnote: If you have a reference to where this pledge can be
found, please let me know so it can be included here.>> that they will
not sue you even if you implement these specifications. You should
evaluate yourself whether this is good enough for your situation.

96.3 Further Warranties
-----------------------

If you need the author or Symlabs to further disclaim IPR interest or
make warranties of non-infringement, such declarations are
available for a fee. Please contact sales@symlabs.com

Legal queries and clarifications will be answered at then-current
Symlabs Professional Services rate, please contact sales@symlabs.com.

20 Testing
==========

ZXID test suite is still in tatters. Some things that should
be tested

1. Will generated HTTP redirect sig validate at IdP?
2. Does IdP issued A7N validate?
3. Validation of EncryptedAssertion?
4. Will generated SOAP binding sig validate at IdP?
5. Does IdP issued SOAP sig validate?

Metadata related

1. IBM metadata (can we parse)
2. Sun metadata (can we parse)

XML related

1. Fully qualified XML parses?
2. Unknown ns prefix that refers to known namespace URI
3. Known ns prefix, referring to wrong URI
4. Known prefix refers to aliased URI
5. Use of default namespaces working?
6. Unknown prefix and URI as long as it is never used
7. Unknown prefix and URI, used
8. Known NS (prefix or URI), unknown element

14 Integration of Other Implementations with ZXID
=================================================

14.1 Conor Cahill's C++ Library for ID-WSF
------------------------------------------

Conor P. Cahill, of AOL and Intel fame, has developed and maintains a
C++ library for ID-WSF 2.0 Web Service Client functionality for
selected application protocols, including the ID-WSF 2.0 Discovery and
some application protcols. Conor also provides a server side package
that implements the corresponding WSP roles in Java. These libraries
are valuable resources and come with extensive test suites - in fact,
passing Conor's test suites has become the gold standard for validity
and interoperability of any ID-WSF implmentations (this is not to
detract from formal IOP events and the Liberty certification program,
but passing Conor's test suite is a good predictor of getting
certified).

*Install Recipe*

Conor's libraries have certain dependencies. Following is my best understanding
of how to get them installed.<<footnote: As of May 2007, Conor's packages
explode in the current working directory. I recommend creating a wrapper
directory first. Also, the client and server functionality can not be
unpacked in same directory without creating conflict and overwriting some files.>>

  mkdir conor
  cd conor
  tar xvf /t/LibertyIDWSFServices-v0.8.2.tgz 
  cd ..
  mkdir conor-cli
  cd conor-cli/
  tar xvf /t/LibertyClientToolkit-v1.0.1.tgz 

14.2 Pat Patterson's php module
-------------------------------

(*** This section also appears in zxid-php.pd)

Pat Patterson of Sun distributes a pure PHP module (not to be confused
with Sun's OpenSSO open source effort, with which Pat has some
contact) that implements some aspects of SAML 2.0. As of May 2007, his
library provides functionality that, by and large, parallels that of the
php_zxid module. A major advatage of his module is that it does not have
C shared library dependency, but beware that he still depends on XML
parsing and popular crypto libraries (openssl) to be available. These
assumptions are not onerous, but you should be aware of them in case
your system differs from main stream deployments.

Overall, Pat's PHP implementation, as of May 2007, is still lacking
in metadata generation and loading (it does not implement Auto-CoT
or Well Known Location) and has some rough edges around less frequently
used parts of the SAML specification. No doubt matters will improve
over the time.

Pat's library handles only SSO and not ID Web Services. It would be
possible to extract the discovery bootstrap from SSO using his library
after which you can use ZXID WSC API to actually call the services.

14.3 Sun OpenSSO
----------------

Sun Microsystems distributes an open source implementation of SAML 2.0.
Their implementation is of primary interest as it provides a freely available
IdP implementation (as of May 2007 IMNSHO the ZXID SP interface is
superior to the OpenSSO SP - and since both implement an open standard,
you can mix ZXID SP with OpenSSO IdP).

Thus, the ZXID to OpenSSO integration reduces to each one acting in its
role using standard wire protocol - SAML 2.0.

14.4 University of Kent's PERMIS PDP
------------------------------------

University of Kent is a supplier of PERMIS XACML PDP software. ZXID has been
interoperated and found compatible on wire with PERMIS as of Nov. 2009.
However, not integration at library or API level has been attempted.

14.5 Shibboleth 2
-----------------

Shibboleth 2, a SAML 2.0 based IdP, has been interoperated with ZXID SP
code as of Nov. 2009.

99 Appendix: Schema Grammars
============================

Large parts of ZXID code are generated from +schema grammars+ which
are a convenient notation for describing XML schmata. This chapter
gives a sampling of some schema grammars that are currently implemented and
distributed in the ZXID package. For fuller list, see sg subdirectory
of the distribution or schemata.pd file.

<<table: Schema grammar syntax
Construct     Description
============= ====================================================================
  ee          Bareword signifies an XML element
  @aa         At (@) prefix signifies an XML attribute
  %tt         Percent (%) prefix signifies a complexType
  &gg         Ampersand (&) prefix a signifies group
  &@ag        Ampersand and at (&@) prefix signifies attributeGroup
  xx -> %tt   Arrow (->) signifies reference to type that defines element or attribute
  xx: ... ;   Colon (:) means that the definition of type follows immediately
  ee          An element or attribute by itself means exactly one occurance is expected
  ee?         Question mark (?) means the element or attribute is optional
  ee*         Asterisk (*) means the element may appear from zero to infinite number of times (same as * in regular expressions)
  ee+         Plus (+) means the element must appear at least once, but may appear an infinite number of times (same as + in regular expressions)
  ee{x,y}     The element must appear between x and y times (same as in regex)
  ee | ee     The pipey symbol (|) means elements are mutually exclusive choices.
  ee ee       Concatenation of elements or attributes means sequence
  base( t )   Introduce Extension base type (derive a type)
  redef( .. ) Redefine a type (using <xs:redefine> construct)
  mixed(1)    Mark a complex type as having mixed content type, i.e. strings and elements alternate
  enum( ... ) Introduce enumeration of xs:strings
  any         xs:any, the XML arbitrary element extension mechanism
  @any        xs:anyAttribute, the XML arbitrary attribute extension mechanism
target( ... ) Define target namespace described by the schema
import( ... ) Bring in other schemata and namespaces
ns( ... )     Declare existence of another namespace (without importing it)
>>

<<tex: \small>>

99.1 SAML 2.0
-------------

99.1.1 saml-schema-assertion-2.0 (sa)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<<schema:
<<sg/saml-schema-assertion-2.0.sg>>
>>

99.1.2 saml-schema-protocol-2.0 (sp)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<<schema:
<<sg/saml-schema-protocol-2.0.sg>>
>>

99.1.4 saml-schema-metadata-2.0 (md)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<<schema:
<<sg/saml-schema-metadata-2.0.sg>>
>>

99.5 Liberty ID-WSF 2.0
-----------------------

99.5.1 liberty-idwsf-utility-v2.0 (lu)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<<schema:
<<sg/liberty-idwsf-utility-v2.0.sg>>
>>

99.5.3 liberty-idwsf-soap-binding-v2.0 (b)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<<schema:
<<sg/liberty-idwsf-soap-binding-v2.0.sg>>
>>

99.5.4 liberty-idwsf-security-mechanisms-v2.0 (sec)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<<schema:
<<sg/liberty-idwsf-security-mechanisms-v2.0.sg>>
>>

99.5.5 liberty-idwsf-disco-svc-v2.0 (di)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<<schema:
<<sg/liberty-idwsf-disco-svc-v2.0.sg>>
>>

99.5.7 id-dap (dap)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<<schema:
<<sg/id-dap.sg>>
>>

99.5.8 liberty-idwsf-subs-v1.0 (subs)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<<schema:
<<sg/liberty-idwsf-subs-v1.0.sg>>
>>

99.5.9 liberty-idwsf-dst-v2.1 (dst)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<<schema:
<<sg/liberty-idwsf-dst-v2.1.sg>>
>>

99.6 SOAP 1.1 Processor wsf-soap11 (e)
--------------------------------------

<<schema:
<<sg/wsf-soap11.sg>>
>>

99.7 XML and Web Services Infrastructure
----------------------------------------

99.7.1 xmldsig-core (ds)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<<schema:
<<sg/xmldsig-core.sg>>
>>

99.7.2 xenc-schema (xenc)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<<schema:
<<sg/xenc-schema.sg>>
>>

99.7.3 ws-addr-1.0 (a)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<<schema:
<<sg/ws-addr-1.0.sg>>
>>

100 Appendix: Some Example XML Blobs
====================================

These XML blobs are for reference. They have been pretty
printed. Indentation indicates nesting level and closing tags have
been abbreviated as "</>". The actual XML on wire generally does not
have any whitespace.

100.1 SAML 2.0 Artifact Response with SAML 2.0 SSO Assertion and Two Bootstraps
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This example corresponds to t/sso-w-bootstraps.xml in the distribution.

Both bootstraps illustrate SAML assertion as bearer token.

 <soap:Envelope
    xmlns:lib="urn:liberty:iff:2003-08"
    xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
    xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing">
  <soap:Body>

    <sp:ArtifactResponse
        xmlns:sp="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:protocol"
        ID="REvgoIIlkzTmk-aIX6tKE"
        InResponseTo="RfAsltVf2"
        IssueInstant="2007-02-10T05:38:15Z"
        Version="2.0">
      <sa:Issuer
          xmlns:sa="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion"
          Format="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:entity">
        https://a-idp.liberty-iop.org:8881/idp.xml</>
      <sp:Status>
        <sp:StatusCode Value="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:Success"/></>

      <sp:Response
          xmlns:sp="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:protocol"
          ID="RCCzu13z77SiSXqsFp1u1"
          InResponseTo="NojFIIhxw"
          IssueInstant="2007-02-10T05:37:42Z"
          Version="2.0">
        <sa:Issuer
            xmlns:sa="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion"
            Format="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:entity">
          https://a-idp.liberty-iop.org:8881/idp.xml</>
        <sp:Status>
          <sp:StatusCode Value="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:Success"/></>

        <sa:Assertion
            xmlns:sa="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion"
            ID="ASSE6bgfaV-sapQsAilXOvBu"
            IssueInstant="2007-02-10T05:37:42Z"
            Version="2.0">
          <sa:Issuer Format="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:entity">
            https://a-idp.liberty-iop.org:8881/idp.xml</>

          <ds:Signature xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#">
            <ds:SignedInfo>
              <ds:CanonicalizationMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#"/>
              <ds:SignatureMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#rsa-sha1"/>
              <ds:Reference URI="#ASSE6bgfaV-sapQsAilXOvBu">
                <ds:Transforms>
                  <ds:Transform Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#enveloped-signature"/>
                  <ds:Transform Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#"/></>
                <ds:DigestMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#sha1"/>
                <ds:DigestValue>r8OvtNmq5LkYwCNg6bsRZAdT4NE=</></></>
            <ds:SignatureValue>GtWVZzHYW54ioHk/C7zjDRThohrpwC4=</></>

          <sa:Subject>
            <sa:NameID
                Format="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:persistent"
                NameQualifier="https://a-idp.liberty-iop.org:8881/idp.xml">PB5fLIA4lRU2bH4HkQsn9</>
            <sa:SubjectConfirmation
                Method="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:cm:bearer">
              <sa:SubjectConfirmationData
                  NotOnOrAfter="2007-02-10T06:37:41Z"
                  Recipient="https://sp1.zxidsp.org:8443/zxidhlo?o=B"/></></>

          <sa:Conditions
              NotBefore="2007-02-10T05:32:42Z"
              NotOnOrAfter="2007-02-10T06:37:42Z">
            <sa:AudienceRestriction>
              <sa:Audience>https://sp1.zxidsp.org:8443/zxidhlo?o=B</></></>

          <sa:Advice>

            <!-- This assertion is the credential for the ID-WSF 1.1 bootstrap (below). -->

            <sa:Assertion
                ID="CREDOTGAkvhNoP1aiTq4bXBg"
                IssueInstant="2007-02-10T05:37:42Z"
                Version="2.0">
              <sa:Issuer
                  Format="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:entity">
                https://a-idp.liberty-iop.org:8881/idp.xml</>
              <ds:Signature xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#">
                <ds:SignedInfo>
                  <ds:CanonicalizationMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#"/>
                  <ds:SignatureMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#rsa-sha1"/>
                  <ds:Reference URI="#CREDOTGAkvhNoP1aiTq4bXBg">
                    <ds:Transforms>
                      <ds:Transform Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#enveloped-signature"/>
                      <ds:Transform Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#"/></>
                    <ds:DigestMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#sha1"/>
                    <ds:DigestValue>dqq/28hw5eEv+ceFyiLImeJ1P8w=</></></>
                <ds:SignatureValue>UKlEgHKQwuoCE=</></>
              <sa:Subject>
                <sa:NameID/>  <!-- *** Bug here!!! -->
                <sa:SubjectConfirmation
                    Method="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:cm:bearer"/></>
              <sa:Conditions
                  NotBefore="2007-02-10T05:32:42Z"
                  NotOnOrAfter="2007-02-10T06:37:42Z">
                <sa:AudienceRestriction>
                  <sa:Audience>https://sp1.zxidsp.org:8443/zxidhlo?o=B</></></></></>

          <sa:AuthnStatement
              AuthnInstant="2007-02-10T05:37:42Z"
              SessionIndex="1171085858-4">
            <sa:AuthnContext>
              <sa:AuthnContextClassRef>
                urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:Password</></></>

          <sa:AttributeStatement>

            <!-- Regular attribute -->

            <sa:Attribute
                Name="cn"
                NameFormat="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:attrname-format:basic">
              <sa:AttributeValue>Sue</></>

            <!-- ID-WSF 1.1 Bootstrap for discovery. See also the Advice, above. -->

            <sa:Attribute
                Name="DiscoveryResourceOffering"
                NameFormat="urn:liberty:disco:2003-08">
              <sa:AttributeValue>
                <di12:ResourceOffering
                    xmlns:di12="urn:liberty:disco:2003-08"
                    entryID="2">
                  <di12:ResourceID>
                    https://a-idp.liberty-iop.org/profiles/WSF1.1/RID-DISCO-sue</>
                  <di12:ServiceInstance>
                    <di12:ServiceType>urn:liberty:disco:2003-08</>
                    <di12:ProviderID>https://a-idp.liberty-iop.org:8881/idp.xml</>
                    <di12:Description>
                      <di12:SecurityMechID>urn:liberty:security:2005-02:TLS:Bearer</>
                      <di12:CredentialRef>CREDOTGAkvhNoP1aiTq4bXBg</>
                      <di12:Endpoint>https://a-idp.liberty-iop.org:8881/DISCO-S</></></>
                  <di12:Abstract>Symlabs Discovery Service Team G</></></></>

            <!-- ID-WSF 2.0 Bootstrap for Discovery. The credential (bearer token) is inline. -->

            <sa:Attribute
                Name="urn:liberty:disco:2006-08:DiscoveryEPR"
                NameFormat="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:attrname-format:uri">
              <sa:AttributeValue>
                <wsa:EndpointReference
                    xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"
                    xmlns:wsu="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd"
                    notOnOrAfter="2007-02-10T07:37:42Z"
                    wsu:Id="EPRIDcjP8ObO9In47SDjO9b37">
                  <wsa:Address>https://a-idp.liberty-iop.org:8881/DISCO-S</>
                  <wsa:Metadata xmlns:di="urn:liberty:disco:2006-08">
                    <di:Abstract>SYMfiam Discovery Service</>
                    <sbf:Framework xmlns:sbf="urn:liberty:sb" version="2.0"/>
                    <di:ProviderID>https://a-idp.liberty-iop.org:8881/idp.xml</>
                    <di:ServiceType>urn:liberty:disco:2006-08</>
                    <di:SecurityContext>
                      <di:SecurityMechID>urn:liberty:security:2005-02:TLS:Bearer</>

                      <sec:Token
                          xmlns:sec="urn:liberty:security:2006-08"
                          usage="urn:liberty:security:tokenusage:2006-08:SecurityToken">

                        <sa:Assertion
                            ID="CREDV6ZBMyicmyvDq9pLIoSR"
                            IssueInstant="2007-02-10T05:37:42Z"
                            Version="2.0">
                          <sa:Issuer Format="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:entity">
                            https://a-idp.liberty-iop.org:8881/idp.xml</>
                          <ds:Signature xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#">
                            <ds:SignedInfo>
                              <ds:CanonicalizationMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#"/>
                              <ds:SignatureMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#rsa-sha1"/>
                              <ds:Reference URI="#CREDV6ZBMyicmyvDq9pLIoSR">
                                <ds:Transforms>
                                  <ds:Transform Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#enveloped-signature"/>
                                  <ds:Transform Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#"/></>
                                <ds:DigestMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#sha1"/>
                                <ds:DigestValue>o2SgbuKIBzl4e0dQoTwiyqXr/8Y=</></></>
                            <ds:SignatureValue>hHdUKaZ//cZ8UYJxvTReNU=</></>
                          <sa:Subject>
                            <sa:NameID
                                Format="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:persistent"
                                NameQualifier="https://a-idp.liberty-iop.org:8881/idp.xml">
                              9my93VkP3tSxEOIb3ckvjLpn0pa6aV3yFXioWX-TzZI=</>
                            <sa:SubjectConfirmation
                                Method="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:cm:bearer"/></>
                          <sa:Conditions
                              NotBefore="2007-02-10T05:32:42Z"
                              NotOnOrAfter="2007-02-10T06:37:42Z">
                            <sa:AudienceRestriction>
                              <sa:Audience>https://a-idp.liberty-iop.org:8881/idp.xml</></></>
                          <sa:AuthnStatement AuthnInstant="2007-02-10T05:37:42Z">
                            <sa:AuthnContext>
                              <sa:AuthnContextClassRef>
                                urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:Password</></></></></></></></></></></></></></></></>

N.B. The AttributeStatement/Attribute/AttributeValue/
EndpointReference/Metadata/SecurityContext/
Token/Assertion/Conditions/AudienceRestriction/Audience is the same as
the IdP because in many products the IdP and Discovery Service roles
are implemented by the same entity. Note also that the audience of the inner
assertion is the discovery service where as the audience of the outer assertion
is the SP that will eventually call the Discovery Service.

100.2 ID-WSF 2.0 Call with X509v3 Sec Mech
------------------------------------------

 <e:Envelope
    xmlns:e="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
    xmlns:b="urn:liberty:sb:2005-11"
    xmlns:sec="urn:liberty:security:2005-11"
    xmlns:wsse="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/20 04/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd"
    xmlns:wsu="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd"
    xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/ addressing">
  <e:Header>
    <wsa:MessageID wsu:Id="MID">123</>
    <wsa:To wsu:Id="TO">...</>
    <wsa:Action wsu:Id="ACT">urn:xx:Query</>
    <wsse:Security mustUnderstand="1">
      <wsu:Timestamp wsu:Id="TS"><wsu:Created>2005-06-17T04:49:17Z</></>
      <wsse:BinarySecurityToken
          ValueType="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-x509-token-profile-1.0#X509v3"
          wsu:Id="X509Token"
          EncodingType="http://docs.oas is-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-soap-message-securiy-1.0#Base64Binary">
        MIIB9zCCAWSgAwIBAgIQ...</>
      <ds:Signature xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#">
        <ds:SignedInfo>
          <ds:Reference URI="#MID">...</>
          <ds:Reference URI="#TO">...</>
          <ds:Reference URI="#ACT">...</>
          <ds:Reference URI="#TS">...</>
          <ds:Reference URI="#X509">
            <ds:DigestMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#sha1"/>
            <ds:DigestValue>Ru4cAfeBAB</></>
          <ds:Reference URI="#BDY">
            <ds:DigestMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#sha1"/>
            <ds:DigestValue>YgGfS0pi56p</></></>
        <ds:KeyInfo><wsse:SecurityTokenReference><wsse:Reference URI="#X509"/></></>
        <ds:SignatureValue>HJJWbvqW9E84vJVQkjDElgscSXZ5Ekw==</></></></>
  <e:Body wsu:Id="BDY">
    <xx:Query/></></>

The salient features of the above XML blob are

* Signature that covers relevant SOAP headers and Body
* Absence of any explicit identity token.

Absence of identity token means that from the headers it is not
possible to identify the taget identity. The signature generally
coveys the Invoker identity (the WSC that is calling the
service). Since one WSC typically serves many principals, knowing
which principal is impossible.  For this reason X509 security mechanism is
seldom used in ID-WSF 2.0 world (with ID-WSF 1.1 the ResourceID
provides an alternative way of identifying the principal, thus making
X509 a viable option).

100.3 ID-WSF 2.0 Call with Bearer (Binary) Sec Mech
---------------------------------------------------

 <e:Envelope
    xmlns:e="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
    xmlns:b="urn:liberty:sb:2005-11"
    xmlns:sec="urn:liberty:security:2005-11"
    xmlns:wsse="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/20 04/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd"
    xmlns:wsu="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd"
    xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/03/ addressing">
  <e:Header>
    <wsa:MessageID wsu:Id="MID">...</>
    <wsa:To wsu:Id="TO">...</>
    <wsa:Action wsu:Id="ACT">urn:xx:Query</>
    <wsse:Security mustUnderstand="1">
      <wsu:Timestamp wsu:Id="TS">
        <wsu:Created>2005-06-17T04:49:17Z</></>
      <wsse:BinarySecurityToken
          ValueType="anyNSPrefix:ServiceSess ionContext"
          EncodingType="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-soap-message-security-1.0#Base64 Binary"
          wsu:Id="BST">
        mQEMAzRniWkAAAEH9RWir0eKDkyFAB7PoFazx3ftp0vWwbbzqXdgcX8fpEqSr1v4
        YqUc7OMiJcBtKBp3+jlD4HPUaurIqHA0vrdmMpM+sF2BnpND118f/mXCv3XbWhiL
        VT4r9ytfpXBluelOV93X8RUz4ecZcDm9e+IEG+pQjnvgrSgac1NrW5K/CJEOUUjh
        oGTrym0Ziutezhrw/gOeLVtkywsMgDr77gWZxRvw01w1ogtUdTceuRBIDANj+KVZ
        vLKlTCaGAUNIjkiDDgti=</>
      <ds:Signature xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig #">
        <ds:SignedInfo>
          <ds:Reference URI="#MID">...</>
          <ds:Reference URI="#TO">...</>
          <ds:Reference URI="#ACT">...</>
          <ds:Reference URI="#TS">...</>
          <ds:Reference URI="#BST">...</>
          <ds:Reference URI="#BDY">
            <ds:DigestMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#sha1 "/>
            <ds:DigestValue>YgGfS0pi56pu</></></>
        ...</></></>
  <e:Body wsu:Id="BDY">
    <xx:Query/></></>

100.4 ID-WSF 2.0 Call with Bearer (SAML) Sec Mech
-------------------------------------------------

 <e:Envelope
    xmlns:e="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
    xmlns:sb="urn:liberty:sb:2005-11"
    xmlns:sec="urn:liberty:security:2005-11"
    xmlns:wsse="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/20 04/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd"
    xmlns:wsu="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd"
    xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"
    xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#"
    xmlns:xenc="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#">
  <e:Header>
    <sbf:Framework version="2.0-simple" e:mustUnderstand="1"
      e:actor="http://schemas.../next"
      wsu:Id="SBF"/>
    <wsa:MessageID wsu:Id="MID">...</>
    <wsa:To wsu:Id="TO">...</>
    <wsa:Action wsu:Id="ACT">urn:xx:Query</>
    <wsse:Security mustUnderstand="1">
      <wsu:Timestamp wsu:Id="TS">
        <wsu:Created>2005-06-17T04:49:17Z</></>

      <sa:Assertion
          xmlns:sa="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion"
          Version="2.0"
          ID="A7N123"
          IssueInstant="2005-04-01T16:58:33.173Z">
        <sa:Issuer>http://idp.symdemo.com/idp.xml</>
        <ds:Signature>...</>
        <sa:Subject>
          <sa:EncryptedID>
            <xenc:EncryptedData>U2XTCNvRX7Bl1NK182nmY00TEk==</>
            <xenc:EncryptedKey>...</></>
          <sa:SubjectConfirmation Method="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:cm:bearer"/></>
        <sa:Conditions
            NotBefore="2005-04-01T16:57:20Z"
            NotOnOrAfter="2005-04-01T21:42:4 3Z">
          <sa:AudienceRestrictionCondition>
            <sa:Audience>http://wsp.zxidsp.org</></></>
        <sa:AuthnStatement
            AuthnInstant="2005-04-01T16:57:30.000Z"
            SessionIndex="6345789">
          <sa:AuthnContext>
            <sa:AuthnContextClassRef>
              urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:PasswordProtectedTransport</></></>
        <sa:AttributeStatement>
          <sa:EncryptedAttribute>
            <xenc:EncryptedData Type="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#Element">
              mQEMAzRniWkAAAEH9RbzqXdgcX8fpEqSr1v4=</>
            <xenc:EncryptedKey>...</></></></>

      <wsse:SecurityTokenReference
          xmlns:wsse11="..."
          wsu:Id="STR1"
          wsse11:TokenType="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-saml-token-profile-1.1#SAMLV2.0">
        <wsse:KeyIdentifier
            ValueType="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-saml-token-profile-1.1#SAMLID">
          A7N123</></>

      <ds:Signature>
        <ds:SignedInfo>
          <ds:Reference URI="#MID">...</>
          <ds:Reference URI="#TO">...</>
          <ds:Reference URI="#ACT">...</>
          <ds:Reference URI="#TS">...</>
          <ds:Reference URI="#STR1">
            <ds:Transform Algorithm="...#STR-Transform">
              <wsse:TransformationParameters>
                <ds:CanonicalizationMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315"/></></></>
          <ds:Reference URI="#BDY"/></>
        ...</></></>
  <e:Body wsu:Id="BDY">
    <xx:Query/></></>

*** is the reference above to wsse11:TokenType really correct?

Note how the <Subject> and the attributes are encrypted such that only
the WSP can open them. This protects against WSC gaining knowledge of
the NameID at the WSP.

<<references:

[SAML11core] SAML 1.1 Core, OASIS, 2003

[SAML11bind] "Bindings and Profiles for the OASIS Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) V1.1", Oasis Standard, 2.9.2003, oasis-sstc-saml-bindings-1.1

[IDFF12] http://www.projectliberty.org/resources/specifications.php

[IDFF12meta] Peted Davis, Ed., "Liberty Metadata Description and Discovery Specification", version 1.1, Liberty Alliance Project, 2004. (liberty-metadata-v1.1.pdf)

[SAML2core] "Assertions and Protocols for the OASIS Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) V2.0", Oasis Standard, 15.3.2005, saml-core-2.0-os

[SAML2prof] "Profiles for the OASIS Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) V2.0", Oasis Standard, 15.3.2005, saml-profiles-2.0-os

[SAML2bind] "Bindings for the OASIS Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) V2.0", Oasis Standard, 15.3.2005, saml-bindings-2.0-os

[SAML2context] "Authentication Context for the OASIS Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) V2.0", Oasis Standard, 15.3.2005, saml-authn-context-2.0-os

[SAML2meta] Cantor, Moreh, Phipott, Maler, eds., "Metadata for the OASIS Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) V2.0", Oasis Standard, 15.3.2005, saml-metadata-2.0-os

[SAML2security] "Security and Privacy Considerations for the OASIS Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) V2.0", Oasis Standard, 15.3.2005, saml-sec-consider-2.0-os

[SAML2conf] "Conformance Requirements for the OASIS Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) V2.0", Oasis Standard, 15.3.2005, saml-conformance-2.0-os

[SAML2glossary] "Glossary for the OASIS Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) V2.0", Oasis Standard, 15.3.2005, saml-glossary-2.0-os

[XML-C14N] XML Canonicalization (non-exclusive), http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315; J. Boyer: "Canonical XML Version 1.0", W3C Recommendation, 15.3.2001, http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-c14n, RFC3076

[XML-EXC-C14N] Exclusive XML Canonicalization, http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-exc-c14n/ 

[Shibboleth] http://shibboleth.internet2.edu/shibboleth-documents.html

[XMLENC] "XML Encryption Syntax and Processing", W3C Recommendation, 10.12.2002, http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlenc-core

[XMLDSIG] "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing", W3C Recommendation, 12.2.2002, http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core, RFC3275

[Disco2] Liberty ID-WSF Discovery service 2.0

[Disco12] Liberty ID-WSF Discovery service 1.1 (liberty-idwsf-disco-svc-v1.2.pdf)

[SecMech2] Liberty ID-WSF 2.0 Security Mechanisms

[SOAPAuthn2] Liberty ID-WSF 2.0 Authentication Service

[SOAPBinding2] Liberty ID-WSF 2.0 framework document that pulls together all aspects

[DST21] Liberty Data Services Template 2.1

[DST20] Liberty DST v2.0

[DST11] Liberty DST v1.1

[IDDAP] Liberty Identity based Directory Access Protocol

[IDPP] Liberty Personal Profile specification.

[Interact11] Liberty ID-WSF Interaction Service protocol 1.1

[FF12] Liberty ID Federation Framework 1.2, Protocols and Schemas

[SUBS2] Liberty Subscriptions and Notifications specification

[Schema1-2] Henry S. Thompson et al. (eds): XML Schema Part 1: Structures, 2nd Ed., WSC Recommendation, 28. Oct. 2004, http://www.w3.org/2002/XMLSchema

[XML] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml

[RFC1950] P. Deutcsh, J-L. Gailly: "ZLIB Compressed Data Format Specification version 3.3", Aladdin Enterprises, Info-ZIP, May 1996

[RFC1951] P. Deutcsh: "DEFLATE Compressed Data Format Specification version 1.3", Aladdin Enterprises, May 1996

[RFC1952] P. Deutcsh: "GZIP file format specification version 4.3", Aladdin Enterprises, May 1996

[RFC2246] TLSv1

[RFC2251] LDAP

[RFC3548] S. Josefsson, ed.: "The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings", July 2003. (Section 4 describes Safebase64)

[MS-MWBF] Microsoft Web Browser Federated Sign-On Protocol Specification, 20080207, http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc236471.aspx

>>

<<htmlpreamble: <title>README ZXID</title><body bgcolor="#330033" text="#ffaaff" link="#ffddff" vlink="#aa44aa" alink="#ffffff"><font face=sans><h1>README ZXID</h1> >>

<<notapath: TCP/IP a.k.a xBSD/Unix n/a Perl/mod_perl PHP/mod_php Java/Tomcat>>
<<EOF: >>

SAML Open Source catalogs
http://saml.xml.org/saml-open-source-implementations
http://openliberty.org/wiki/index.php/Existing_Identity_Systems#Open_Source_
http://docs.safehaus.org/display/HAUS/Id+OSS+Map

Suspicious: when decrypting elements and plugging their plain
text variants into original data structure, the wo pointers
are not updated. Thus the "old" encrypted data may remain
accessible for some purposes.

Pointers from Pat
http://rnd.feide.no/2007/04/13/light-bulb-update-request-for-testing/
https://opensso.dev.java.net/public/extensions/index.html

Add macros for OK response.

http://wiki.oasis-open.org/security/SstcSamlX509AuthnAttribProfile
http://wiki.oasis-open.org/security/SimpleSignBinding


On CYGWIN lockf() and flock() apparently are not defined.
On mingw they are.

Way to pass RelayState through zxid_simple()

AuditExplorer

elgg.org is very relevant for e-Learning / HR-XML market
https://imb.phil.uni-augsburg.de/elgg/

FEDORA

Moodle (Open Source, Open University)
MyStuff (Open Source, Open University)

Privacy features of SAML/Liberty
User centric features of SAML/Liberty
- User control (not necessarily interaction every steps of the way)

ECP + IS plugin for Firefox

==================
In general, wild card cert is one whose cn field is of form *.cellmail.com

The openssl command for creating CSR is 'openssl req', for example

> openssl req -new -nodes -keyout pkey.pem -out req.pem       
Generating a 1024 bit RSA private key
......................++++++
.................................................................................++++++
writing new private key to 'pkey.pem'
-----
You are about to be asked to enter information that will be incorporated
into your certificate request.
What you are about to enter is what is called a Distinguished Name or a DN.
There are quite a few fields but you can leave some blank
For some fields there will be a default value,
If you enter '.', the field will be left blank.
-----
Country Name (2 letter code) [AU]:FI
State or Province Name (full name) [Some-State]:
Locality Name (eg, city) []:Helsinki
Organization Name (eg, company) [Internet Widgits Pty Ltd]:Tietosampo
Organizational Unit Name (eg, section) []:
Common Name (eg, YOUR name) []:*.tietosampo.fi
Email Address []:sampo@iki.fi

Please enter the following 'extra' attributes
to be sent with your certificate request
A challenge password []:
An optional company name []:


In the example above I left the challenge password and company name empty, but
it could be that Thawte insists that you fill in something there. They may
also have specific requirements about the company name (and possibly the Organization
Name and Oraganization Unit Name) matching the registered name of your company.

Anyway, the output from the above should be

> cat req.pem 
-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE REQUEST-----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-----END CERTIFICATE REQUEST-----

Or if you want to convince yourself that the wild card is
really in there, you can check with

> openssl asn1parse  <req.pem      
    0:d=0  hl=4 l= 450 cons: SEQUENCE          
    4:d=1  hl=4 l= 299 cons: SEQUENCE          
    8:d=2  hl=2 l=   1 prim: INTEGER           :00
   11:d=2  hl=3 l= 129 cons: SEQUENCE          
   14:d=3  hl=2 l=  11 cons: SET               
   16:d=4  hl=2 l=   9 cons: SEQUENCE          
   18:d=5  hl=2 l=   3 prim: OBJECT            :countryName
   23:d=5  hl=2 l=   2 prim: PRINTABLESTRING   :FI
   27:d=3  hl=2 l=  19 cons: SET               
   29:d=4  hl=2 l=  17 cons: SEQUENCE          
   31:d=5  hl=2 l=   3 prim: OBJECT            :stateOrProvinceName
   36:d=5  hl=2 l=  10 prim: PRINTABLESTRING   :Some-State
   48:d=3  hl=2 l=  17 cons: SET               
   50:d=4  hl=2 l=  15 cons: SEQUENCE          
   52:d=5  hl=2 l=   3 prim: OBJECT            :localityName
   57:d=5  hl=2 l=   8 prim: PRINTABLESTRING   :Helsinki
   67:d=3  hl=2 l=  19 cons: SET               
   69:d=4  hl=2 l=  17 cons: SEQUENCE          
   71:d=5  hl=2 l=   3 prim: OBJECT            :organizationName
   76:d=5  hl=2 l=  10 prim: PRINTABLESTRING   :Tietosampo
   88:d=3  hl=2 l=  24 cons: SET               
   90:d=4  hl=2 l=  22 cons: SEQUENCE          
   92:d=5  hl=2 l=   3 prim: OBJECT            :commonName
   97:d=5  hl=2 l=  15 prim: T61STRING         :*.tietosampo.fi
  114:d=3  hl=2 l=  27 cons: SET               
  116:d=4  hl=2 l=  25 cons: SEQUENCE          
  118:d=5  hl=2 l=   9 prim: OBJECT            :emailAddress
  129:d=5  hl=2 l=  12 prim: IA5STRING         :sampo@iki.fi
  143:d=2  hl=3 l= 159 cons: SEQUENCE          
  146:d=3  hl=2 l=  13 cons: SEQUENCE          
  148:d=4  hl=2 l=   9 prim: OBJECT            :rsaEncryption
  159:d=4  hl=2 l=   0 prim: NULL              
  161:d=3  hl=3 l= 141 prim: BIT STRING        
  305:d=2  hl=2 l=   0 cons: cont [ 0 ]        
  307:d=1  hl=2 l=  13 cons: SEQUENCE          
  309:d=2  hl=2 l=   9 prim: OBJECT            :sha1WithRSAEncryption
  320:d=2  hl=2 l=   0 prim: NULL              
  322:d=1  hl=3 l= 129 prim: BIT STRING        

Here we can see that hitting empty for State or Provice question was not
such a smart idea after all: it used nonsensical default value. I guess
you would have to invent something as place holder.
 
> On another train of thought, if I was to have a local CA here, could I use the
> commercial certificate I get to sign the x509 certificates I would make? The
> x509 would be used to sign emails via smart cards. This is not a commercial
> project but rather one to learn more about smart cards. Sun has made code
> available to manage smart cards so it may be interesting to learn more.

The regular SSL certificate usually will not work as CA certificate due
to certificate usage indicators. Technically it is possible to ignore
such indicators and use the certificate anyway, but a lot of widely
distributed software does not ignore them so you would have a lot of
interoperability problems or at least confirmation questions.

Commercial CAs do issue CA certificates, but they tend to be expensive.

Even if you get commercial CA certificate, you should know that some (older)
software only supports one level of certificate hierarchy. This problem
has surfaced when some commercial CAs tried to structure themselves
internally as multi layer CA.

If you want to run your own CA, all you really have to do is configure
the CA cert of yours to be trusted by all the software. For browsers
this is easy enough within the GUI itself. For servers (such as apache
or dsproxy), there is a way to do this at config file level. Configuring
direct trust to your CA cert tends to be easier than trying to get
commercial CA cert and playing multilayer CA games.

Re Thunderbird, I am bit surprised that it does not accept self signed
certs. It seems more probable to me that it actually can be configured
to accept them, but does not ship with that turned on to protect
naive users. The most basic way to use self signed cert would be
to import the self signed cert as one of the trusted CA certs.

Was your problem with Thunderbird not accepting the IMAPS connection? In
that case the Thunderbird client software needs to start trusting the
self signed cert as CA cert. There is probably a GUI way to do this - probably
something very similar to the Firefox GUI for configuring certs.

If you were trying to configure a ClientTLS certificate and the IMAPS
server refused it, then you need to adjust configuration in the
server end, probably in a config file.



-----

ZXID CARML stack

* frontend API bindings
* middle layer routing and mapping engine
* backend connectors

--Sampo


-----

http://saml.xml.org/products
http://saml.xml.org/zxid

ZXID.org Identity Management toolkit implements standalone SAML 2.0
and Liberty ID-WSF 2.0 stacks. It is a C implementation with minimal
external dependencies - OpenSSL, CURL, and zlib - ensuring easy
deployment (no DLLhell). Due to its small footprint and efficient and
accurate schema driven implementation, it is suitable for embedded and
high volume applications. Language bindings to all popular highlevel
languages such as PHP, Perl, and Java, are provided via SWIG.  ZXID
implements, as of July 07, SP, WSC, and WSP roles.




Paul Madsen wrote:
> http://saml.xml.org/forum/calculating-digest-of-an-authentication-statement
> 
> Dear Sirs, my name is Gianluca from Italy
>  I'm trying to calculate the Digest value of a SAML Authentication
> STatement whith the SHA-1 algorithm. Let us suppose that we are dealing
> with a string representing the following node:
> 
> <saml:AuthenticationStatement>
>     <saml:Subject>
>         <saml:NameIdentifier>GIANLUCA</saml:NameIdentifier>
>     </saml:Subject>
> </saml:AuthenticationStatement>
> 
> When I try to calculate SHA-1 with the function  b64_sha1(str2Digest) 
> what
> exactly should the string str2Digest contain? I mean it should be equal to
> "<saml:AuthenticationStatement><saml:Subject><saml:NameIdentifier>GIANLUCA<
> /saml:NameIdentifier></saml:Subject></saml:AuthenticationStatement>"
> or only "GIANLUCA" or ....what else?

Its a pity he did not provide email address, but lets hope this reaches
him anyway.

1. There is no univesally agreed way to digest Authentication Statements
2. "Universally" agreed way to digest XML in general is exc-c14n (exclusive
   canonicalization) [XML-EXC-C14N]. This method is used by all certified
   SAML implementations. It is also the method used by digital
   signatures [XMLDSIG].
3. Canonicalization is difficult and typically 80% of digital signature
   failures derive from canonicalization bugs. Of those 95% are
   XML namespace related (curse the inventor of XML namespaces), and
   4% are whitespace related.
4. For what you are apparently trying to do, it is important to
   digest the entire canonicalized Authentication Statement.
   If the question had been about canonicalizing the NameID, it
   would still be important to digest the entire canonicalized
   Name Identifier as the actual value in isolation is meaningless.
   You need the identifier type and namespace qualification
   for the digest to be meaningful.

[XML-C14N] XML Canonicalization (non-exclusive), http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315; J. Boyer: "Canonical XML Version 1.0", W3C Recommendation, 15.3.2001, http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-c14n, RFC3076

[XML-EXC-C14N] Exclusive XML Canonicalization, http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-exc-c14n/ 

[XMLDSIG] "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing", W3C Recommendation, 12.2.2002, http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core, RFC3275

Cheers,
--Sampo
